Susannah Breslin

Susannah BreslinSusannah Breslin is a writer, photographer, and comics-artist whose work has appeared in Salon, Harper's Bazaar, Details, Nerve, Variety, and Exquisite Corpse, among other publications.
Susannah's writing
and photography
also appeared on Identity Theory in 2002, when she was
a featured
author
. She is the author of You're
a Bad Man, Aren't You?
(Future Tense), from which she recently
read at the New
Orleans Book Fair
.

Susannah grew up in Berkeley, California, and is very tall for
a girl. Currently, she is at work on a semi-autobiographical novel,
If Only These Hands Could Talk, based on her experiences
loitering around Porn Valley.

Matt Borondy: Here's a quote from Andy Warhol's
Philosophy of Andy Warhol: "Sex is more exciting on
the screen and between the pages than between the sheets anyway.
Let the kids read about it and look forward to it, and then right
before they're going to get to the reality, break the news to them
that they've already had the most exciting part, that it's behind
them already. Fantasy love is much better than reality love."

Susannah Breslin: Well, Andy was a real joykill,
Matt, now wasn't he? The distinction I would make is that sex is
far more interesting to do than to watch. Andy's quote has depressed
me. Good thing that he never had kids. I would not like to imagine
his counsel to a son about to lose his virginity. "I want to
let you know, son, this is going to be incredibly disappointing
for you." Imagine trying to get it up in the face of that.

MB: I think being Andy Warhol's son, you would
have been pretty off-center by the time you hit puberty anyway,
what with all your transvestite babysitters constantly popping amphetamines
and plotting to kill your dad. In all of your research as a sex
writer, have you seen a lot of Andy Warhol movies? I can never find
them, anywhere, and yet I've had this (probably psychotic) curiosity
about them for a while.

SB: Too true, Matt, too true. I think I saw some
Warhol flicks in a film studies class I took at Berkeley. I seem
to remember they were boring. I think we watched part of "Empire,"
so this is not surprising. But, enough about Warhol. Let's talk
about porn. What was the first porn movie you ever watched? Do you
recall?

MB: The earliest thing that comes to mind as far
as seeing naked people enjoying each other's company on film was
this Euro-porn that was on Cinemax probably late on a friday night
when I was like 12. I remember it because it was so out of place
-- like, those movie channels show a lot of sex-type movies, but
this one was straight porn, grainy and hardcore and everything.
It was very 70s-ish. I have a mental block about actually buying
or renting porn, though, so I've never actually paid money for it.
I can't even fathom how the conversation would go with the cashier
person. I'm shy, or maybe too influenced by random Catholic ideals
that were sublimated into my worldview. I think if I ever decide
to rent or buy a pornographic movie someday, I'm just going to tell
them I'm getting it for the music. How about you? What was the movie/event
that sparked your interest in all this beaver-picture stuff?

SB: Well, I was about 15, and I was over at a
girlfriend's house, and there were a bunch of people there, and no parents, and someone had a porno. It starred John Holmes. I remember that he was rather sad looking, sort of seemingly hiding under a messy poof of dirty-blonde hair. And there was a sort of floppy woman, in a blue polyester number, I think, trying to get it on with him. Holmes was having trouble wrangling his dangling beast.
I recently put this scene into the novel I'm writing, If Only
These Hands Could Talk
, my semi-autobiographical novel set in Porn Valley.
But, in the book and this scene, "I" am a man, Xerxes. To Xerxes,
the most impactful thing about watching this porn movie is in his relationship to its
sad internal mood; "It was, in fact, familiar," is how it goes in the novel.

MB: This talk of emotions in relation to porn
reminds me of that scene in The Big Lebowski where Jackie
Treehorn, the pornographer, laments that there aren't enough "feelings"
in adult movies anymore. I guess the question that I can make out
of all this is, how does writing fiction about porn give you a chance
to explore the emotional side of sex and/or the sex industry...are
you interested in that aspect of it, or are you mainly looking to
give your readers a pleasurable time? What do you see as the main
goal of your writing, as far as what you want to give the readers?

SB: I am never interested in giving anyone a good
time. In my fiction, I'm not seeking to "explore sex,"
or some cockydoodle like that, and I'm entirely uninterested in
giving my readers a "pleasurable time"; I actually feel
vaguely nauseated writing that phrase. You know how some people
like "feel-good" movies? I like "feel-bad" movies.
Same is true for books. As a sexual subject, I'm most interested
in Porn Valley--its culture, its population, its vocabulary, its
laws--and the psychological aspect of that world, in addition to
the various sex industries at large, and the psyches of those involved
in other extremist sexual subcultures. So, exploring these places
isn't about pleasure; it's about pulling back the skin to see what's
going on underneath. Take, for example, visiting the set of a bukkake
film. I'm surrounded by eighty-plus mostly naked men looking to
masturbate onto the face of one woman. If you are at all interested
in pulling back the scrim on the face of humanity, or, in this particular
instance, say, the veneer behind which men, or Man, hides, that
scene is so far outside the controlling do's-and-don'ts of contemporary
society that one can actually witness some kind of truth there,
no matter how "obscene," laid bare. That's what I want
to give the readers, a peek through that peephole. Why do some want
to look and some to look away?

MB: See, you might be on to something, because
I personally don't have any conscious desire to take part in or
watch a bukkake film, but I know people who definitely would, and
a lot of times I wonder if they're in touch with their nature and
I'm just a weirdo repressed by society, or if they're just nuts.
I really don't understand the mechanisms of desire very well. Anyway,
I was wondering a couple of things about the porn industry that
maybe you can help me figure out. For one, do they have, like, market
research? I mean how do the pornographers know how many bukkake
films they need to make, how many girl-on-girl films, what kinds
of scenes are most popular to people, that sort of thing? I can
imagine some sort of boardroom meeting at Vivid Video, "We
haven't met our gangbang quota this year."

Porn,
itself, is unusual. It is, by its very nature, extreme and
explicit. It is fascinating and horrifying to look inside
human bodies as they ram themselves into one another. I don't
know that we, as a culture, are ready to look at sex, and
porn, without blinking or flinching, as of yet.

SB: Yes, well, Vivid isn't exactly a gangbang
kind of company, but I think I get your point. My impression is
there's not a whole lot of sophisticated market research going on
in Porn Valley, but they're watching very, very closely what's selling,
and paying attention to what the porn consumer fans are telling
them they want. Most porn-makers are interested in the bottom-line,
that's it. As far as content, they're pretty astute about following
sexual trends as they rise and fall. For example, anal and "barely
legal" videos are pretty popular right now. But, Matt, what
I really want to know is: Am I the first person to say "anal"
on Identity Theory? And, if so, can I get some kind of an award
or free gift for being that person?

MB: That's a good question. Howard
Zinn
might have said it in talking about American foreign policy.
The Identity Theory spiritual guru, Al Dawg, says it at least 200
times a day, but his writings remain unpublished. So, yeah, you're
probably the first. I got sucked into buying a bunch of Pizza Hut
coupons the other day, and I don't even like Pizza Hut. So I could
give you a buy-one-get-one-free, or something, as a reward. I'd
like to ask a question about porn actors, but I can't think of a
good one. The perception is probably that most of them get involved
with it because they're druggies needing money -- or the cliche
about moving to Hollywood to become an actress and ending up in
porn. But I'm wondering if there are some reasons that people do
it that are more interesting/unique than that. So, talk about that,
and also, I want to know your impression of porn actors in general,
what their lives are like, how they view their jobs, etc. Or you
can talk about midgets if you want...

SB: Well, where to begin--with the pizza or the
midgets? The cliches about porn stars are true for some, and not
for others. Two exceptions that come to mind are Chloe and Nina
Hartley. I love those ladies. My impression is they're in the business
because they want to be there, that there's something in living
a life in porn that fulfills their fundamental essence. They're
both terrifically smart, too. I talked once to Chloe about what
it was like having Martin Amis visit one of her sets, when he was
doing research for Yellow Dog. She was underwhelmed, she
said, explaining she was more impressed with his father's books
than his. Nina has compared her work as a porn star to that of a
bodhisattva, a healer of sorts. The male porn stars of the business
can be quite interesting, as well; Susan Faludi's essay on the breed,
which can be found in Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American
Man
, is really definitive in this milieu. Those guys are like
subjugated machines, in a way, slaves to their own penises and to
the porn industry itself.

MB: I was reading this book that came out in early
September by DJ Levien called Swagbelly -- it's about a
Jewish pornographer worth $100 million who struggles with his family
life and lack of respect in the community. And then last month Fox
came out with that Skin show about the compassionate rich
Jewish pornographer with a rebellious teenage daughter. So it's
a good time of year to be a rich Jewish pornographer with kids,
apparently. Anyway, I was thinking, you know, with the internet,
there is so much porn now, in everyday life. Even the most conservative
minded people can't check their email without a few subject lines
involving sex with animals and whatnot every day. So I've been wondering
about how pornography is going to be perceived in the future. Because,
really, it's everywhere already, and it seems to be just a matter
of time before the people who produce and act in pornographic movies
will be less stigmatized by society. Do you think that's possible
-- or do you think there will always be a puritanical view towards
these people in America?

SB: First off, I'd make a distinction between
porn stars and porn videos.
But the question of their mainstreaming is everywhere now, isn't
it? You
can't shake a stick these days without banging it into the head
of one more
reporter doing an article on how mainstream porn is becoming. Will
the stars of porn become more mainstream? Sure. Will porn become
more mainstream? I think it will take longer than we expect. There
is something different about porn that sets it apart from, say,
body modification, or ghettofabulousness, or whatever the latest
subculture is that the mainstream is co-opting. Porn, itself, is
unusual. It is, by its very nature, extreme and explicit. It is
fascinating and horrifying to look inside human bodies as they ram
themselves into one another. I don't know that we, as a culture,
are ready to look at sex, and porn, without blinking or flinching,
as of yet.

MB: I agree, and I think I have an idea for a
porno movie. Instead of the
plumber who comes to fix the faucet and then gets down with the
housewife, you have a reporter coming to do a story on porn becoming
mainstream, interviewing the girl who plays the housewife, then
getting it on with her. Yeah, that's a winner, I should totally
go buy a camera and make that one right now. Anyway, we haven't
talked at all about your new book, You're A Bad Man, Aren't
You?
, which the legendary Kevin Sampsell is publishing at Future
Tense. So, hey, what's your book about? What nice things can you
say about Future Tense?

SB: Please, Matt, give me a cameo in your first
porno movie. I beg of you. You're a Bad Man, Aren't You?
is a collection of short stories featuring midget love, mannequin
fetishism, pornographers gone wild, and a bunch of other freaky
things. It's Pornographic Postmodern Literature, which means you
can't masturbate to it, or, at least, you really shouldn't, if you
care about me, or my feelings, at all. It just came out in October.
The book is a good time, and I would have to recommend it wholeheartedly.
Future Tense Books
is like the publishing-house version of a party in your pants. The
ringleader there is Kevin Sampsell, who is really great because
he published my book. He's also a totally badass writer. I love
A
Common Pornography
deeply.

MB: Kevin is definitely cool -- he's
written some for Identity Theory
too.
Okay, well, we haven't talked about the death of the Reverse
Cowgirl Blog
yet, and the RCB is important because it's surely
how a lot of people became familiar with your work. I'm very sad
about the extinction of the RCB because it means fewer hits for
Identity Theory, and also my letter to Comedy Central on your behalf
is no longer up on the web. How could you do this to me, Susannah?

SB: It wasn't hard, Matt.

MB: The main thing I miss about the RCB is your
digital photography
collection. Are you still taking lots of pictures? What else are
you working
on these days?

SB: I'm still taking photographs. I'm going to
do something a little
different with one of my bukkake photos for an upcoming art gallery
group
show. I'm going to blow the image up very large, so, up-close, it
looks like
broken down pixel splatter, but, far away, you see it for the bukkake
girl
it is. I've got a few other book projects on which I'm working,
too. But,
mostly, I'm concentrating on my novel full-time. That's great. It's
coming
along very well. It requires me to rehash every weird thing that
I've ever
seen, but then process it into something new through the filter
of fiction.
I think that's a good thing. Maybe it's cathartic. I hope so.

MB: Awesome. Thanks a lot for doing the interview
-- hopefully it will be
more compelling than those "interviews" Ron Jeremy does
on late-night TV
promoting male-enhancement products. Do you have any final comments
on Postmodern Porn Lit, whores, midgets, death, or anything else
people splice in between frames of Disney films?

SB: Midgets are cool. One day, I hope to have
one as a pet. I will keep it
on a leash, and walk it every day, and feed it from a dish. We will
have the
best of times. Of this, I am sure.

Scroll to Top