identity theory

interviews
fiction
nonfiction
music
social justice
film
books
visuals
verse



weblogs

Social Justice Blog

Politics, activism and timely social issues

Remnick v. Obama
From the New Yorker's "Online Only" content: David Remnick talks with Barack Obama at the American Magazine Conference in Phoenix.

"The biggest problem we have in our politics, and our campaigns press this upon candidates, is to lie about the choices that have to be made. And to obfuscate and to fudge. And so by the time the person arrives there people are already set up for disappointment...

"People don't want hard choices. Everybody's all happy and feel-good, until you actually say to them, Well, you know what? Actually, if we have a real energy plan it's going to cost something. There's not a magic energy store where we can buy a new gadget; we're going to have to invest and make some tough decisions. But I do think the American people respond better to that conversation than we give them credit for, and it's not tried often enough."

Read the whole article.



Unreal Reality: Chernobyl Ten Years Later
"Chernobyl showed us how dangerous is modern civilization's 'cult of force.' How glaring are the imperfections of this reliance on power and coercion above all else. How dangerous our modern worldviews are to us ourselves. How humanitarian man is lagging behind technological man." -Svetlana Alexievich-

For her latest book, "Voices of Chernobyl," Svetlana Alexievich interviewed five hundred survivors of the 1986 catastrophe that took place when the seemingly unreal happened, a nuclear reactor accident that spewed radioactive chaos into the small and politically troubled Chernobyl. In this interview with Ana Lucic of the Center for Book Culture, Alexievich discusses the reality of the situation (versus the mainstream media coverage) as well as the ramifications of the "cult of force" on people who were as much the victims of political strife as of a scientific disaster.

Read the interview.



American Methods
On ZNet, Portland anarchist Kristian Williams discusses her book American Methods, which "deals with the US government's use of torture, starting with an analysis of the Abu Ghraib scandal," and claims that "careful reading shows how the torture at Abu Ghraib, and similar abuses elsewhere, came as a predictable consequence of policy decisions made a couple years earlier."

She continues, "In American Methods, I push the analysis further, and argue that the policy decisions characterizing the War on Terror actually fit pretty neatly in a much longer historical arc of US imperialism. But the sad fact is, the American public as a whole is almost completely unaware of that history."

Read the whole story.



Against an Imperial Internet
Bill Moyers and Scott Fogdall have a piece about the future of the Internet on TomPaine.com.

"The Bush majority on the FCC has bowed to the interests of the big cable and telephone companies to strip away, or undo, the Internet's basic DNA of openness and non-discrimination. When some members of Congress set out to restore network neutrality, they were thwarted by the industry's high spending lobbyists. This happened according to the standard practices of a rented Congress--with little public awareness and scarce attention from the press. There had been a similar blackout 10 years ago, when, in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Congress carved up our media landscape. They drove a dagger in the heart of radio, triggered a wave of consolidation that let the big media companies get bigger, and gave away to rich corporations--for free--public airwaves worth billions." [More...]

Note: Bill Moyers is hosting "The Net At Risk," a documentary special airing tomorrow on PBS.



The Audacity of Hope
Time is running a clip from Barack Obama's new memoir, The Audacity of Hope. The excerpt mainly deals with Obama's view of religion as it relates to politics:

"What our deliberative, pluralistic democracy demands is that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals must be subject to argument and amenable to reason. If I am opposed to abortion for religious reasons and seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or invoke God's will and expect that argument to carry the day. If I want others to listen to me, then I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all." [More...]

See also: BarackObama.com




join
sign up for the identity theory newsletter.

your e-mail:

bloggers

The Social Justice blog is maintained by Alexandra Tursi, Elham Shabahat, Matt Borondy and others. To contribute a link or story, email Alexandra.

Archives

May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008


etc.

Print this page
E-mail this page

 Subscribe in a reader

 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?






 

All work on Identity Theory -- with the exception of the public-domain classics -- is copyright its original author. The site is best viewed with the most recent version of Internet Explorer.