identity theory

interviews
fiction
nonfiction
music
social justice
film
books
visuals
verse


weblogs

What We're Reading

A group book-discussion weblog

burned out on books
After years of disagreeing with the nay-sayers who rail against the perils of internet culture, I have to admit that the time I spend online is responsible for my book burn-out.

These days, I have to fight to get through a book. The fiction seems tired, redundant, predictable. The non-fiction is pedantic and uninteresting. And there are any number of fascinating (I'm convinced) emails, blogs, and online magazines begging for my attention. When I do get some non-online reading done, it's usually because the internet went out or my laptop is in use by my husband. And that's just sad.

It's easy for you to tell me to just not spend so much time online, but all of the work I do involves being at a computer and using the internet. I've noticed recently that I'm so used to being online that when I'm not at the computer, I'm pacing around the apartment not knowing what to do with myself.

I admit I have a problem; no intervention needed. But where's the rehab center for internet junkies? Or, can you point me to the book that will restore my desire for reading?

Labels:




Looking for Alaska and The Book Thief
So after many days of intermittent reading and napping (napping because the New York weather is killing us all slowly one snow flake at a time, reading because there is really only so much bad television I can let infiltrate my brain) I want to talk about a book most adults probably haven't made time to read. Why? It's a kid's book, or to be more specific, it is teen romance. Ewwww! I know, I'm almost 25 and these things still find their way on my bookshelves. Although, to be honest, I never read teen romance as a teen, I detest romance in the typical capacity.

However, John Green's Looking for Alaska, winner of the highly coveted 2006 Michael L. Printz Award (among multiple other accolades) is absolutely amazing and far from typical. A-M-A-Z-I-N-G. On one of life's unexpected tangents--going to boarding school of his own volition--Miles Halter discovers what happens when you start living life, meet the first girl who haunts you, become part of a real group of friends for the first time, and have your life dramatically altered by your first tragedy. I'm horrible at encapsulating a plot in a few lines but just know, though the plot almost seems like it should be a cliche, instead it is full of wit, raw emotion, and quite frankly, some very fine writing from a talented young author. Also, if you have a particular interest in u-tube, I must say, John and his brother Hank have this fabulous video blog conversation going on and in one, the ultra-talented John Green does a song (and a bit of a dance) explicating on the virtues of a game called--Nerd Fighters. (http://www.brotherhood2.com)

As I know have you hopefully, hopelessly intrigued by the world of children's literature, I must tell you, you must, I mean, must, read Mark Zuzak's The Book Thief. Just know, death narrates, and he has a wicked sense of humor. But more than that, you meet this little girl who steals books that in some sense represent pivotal moments in our lives. I stole a book once from my high school, The Great Gatsby. Ratty library binding. Musty smell. I still have it. It still means something to me. And no! I'm never giving it back! And no! I don't feel guilty! I would love to have a first edition of it actually. I would love to have a first edition of any classic actually...but enough waxing poetic on that.

Anyway, The Book Thief, is absolutely wonderful and it's actually a shame if it is pigeon-holed as a young adult read because the subject matter, the writing, heck even the length, there is nothing YA about it. It is just a tremendous read for anyone, no matter what their age is.

-Vicki Lame

Labels:




Revolutionary Road
I have two rules for reading. Rule #1: Read the style/genre/period you are in the mood for. If you are on a kick, honor it. It will guide you. (This, in my opinion, is the only reason there are people out there who don't like Jane Austen. They simply weren't in the mood for her.) Rule #2: Push yourself, even if you're not in the mood. There's too much out there and precious little time.

I'm currently going with Rule #1 and bathing myself in short stories of the past few decades. Most recently: Raymond Carver. Lorrie Moore. Alice Munro. On deck: Mary Gaitskill. David Gates. A.M. Homes.

I took one break, to read Revolutionary Road, and wouldn't you know it, it's the one book I can actually say anything about at the moment. (I guess the stories are still washing over me.)

But what a book. Sure, it slides toward melodrama now and again. But it's good melodrama. In Frank and April Wheeler, Yates has given us a pair of ordinary people with extraordinary fantasies. The Wheelers' tragic flaw is a perception of their own specialness in the midst of the ugly, unspecial suburbs. It is so easy to sympathize with this feeling of "we are better than this." But Yates also maintains a remarkable ironic distance -- to remind us how wild and impossible their dreaming is, how empty their rhetoric. They want to get outside of the fallen world, but they also strive to conquer it, to be recognized as the best by the people and institutions within it. Can't have your cake and eat it, too, Yates says. That he can hold this view without condemning the Wheelers (without making us hate them) is a great accomplishment. Don't we all want to escape to Paris and be among the "super-heroic people"? And aren't we all doomed to just be ourselves?

So much has been written about this book, but in the case of an underappreciated "writer's writer" like Yates, it seems you can't really praise him enough.

That was my first post, but I'll be back soon enough with some thoughts on those stories. Maybe even an answer to the question: "What's a story?"

-- Katherine Hill

Labels: ,




The New Stephen King
An interesting combination of long novels, this month.

The first was Stephen King's new one, "Lisey's Story." I got this as a Christmas present. I read my first King novel ("The Shining") when I was a wee lad of 11 or 12. Way too young to be reading King. It warped me. Before age 14 I had polished off "The Stand," "Salem's Lot," "Night Shift"...well, in fact, everything he'd written to date. Did I mention by age 14? Seriously warped me. (Context: I was born in 1970.)

More recently, the work has been hit or miss. Maybe Steve was getting stale. Or, maybe, I had enough horror in my own life that Steve didn't have a lot to show me anymore. But there have been a few of the more recent books that shook me like old King. "Bag of Bones" from a few years back was one such book. And "Lisey's Story" is another. It was a pleasure to again read a Stephen King novel and enjoy every moment of it. It was nice in another way, too; the book clearly meant many things to him on many levels, and was a love letter to many things for many reasons, but the obvious ones aside, there was another: it read to me like a love letter to those of us who had read him as a kid then gone on to become writers. It was a bit startling, frankly; kind of like having ol' Steve over my shoulder saying, "See? I told you. I warned you. But cool beans anyway, right? Not like you had a choice, right? Rock on, baby."

Since it's that kind of month (long novels, warped stories, returns to childhood), I just started Elizabeth Kostova's "The Historian." Looking forward to this one like nobody's business. I'll report back later.

-Christian Bauman

Labels: , , ,




Staff Reading for the Tiny Month of February
Robert Birnbaum has been reading Naked Sleeper by Sigrid Nunez, House of Meetings by Martin Amis, Zoli by Colum McCann, Joseph Epstein's essay on turning 70, Chris Hedges' Nov 2004 aricle on the Christian Right and the Rise of American Fascism (that no major US periodical would publish), Jon Lee Anderson on Hugo Chavez and also the Taliban, Jim Harrison's essay in the NYTBR ("Feed The Poets"), Joyce Oates on Anne Leibovitz in the NYRB, Sigrid Nunez on Susan Sontag in Salamagundi, Matters of Honor by Louis Begley, Better by Atul Gawande, Surveillance by Jonathan Raban, and the story of the week (Feb 3) at Mr Beller's Neighborhood.

Summer Block is working on a travel essay/book review on Vikram Chandra's work, so she's taking Red Earth and Pouring Rain, Love and Longing in Bombay, and Sacred Games along to India with her. On her desk at home she has Augusten Burroughs' Running with Scissors, David Sedaris' (edited) Children Playing Before a Statue of Hercules, Nabokov's Lectures on Literature, Freud's The Uncanny, and her still-unopened copy of Pynchon's Against the Day.

Ali Salerno has a thing for Harper's. She's also started reading: The Moonstone, by Wilkie Collins. The Collected Stories of Richard Bausch. VQR. Death in the Haymarket, by James Green.

Ross Simonini is on Never Let Me Go by Ishiguro, Six Memos for the New Millenium by Calvino, 18 Stories by Heinrich Boll, and Design with X by Dean Young.

Alexandra Tursi is all over Life is Elsewhere by Milan Kundera, The Black Book by Orhan Pamuk, Eat Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert, and The Beautiful Fall by Alicia Drake

Andrew Whitacre is checking out Good Soldier Svejk by Jaroslav Hasek and The Plot Against America by Philip Roth. Then mags...Tin House, Believer, Post Road.

Labels: , , , ,




Reading ADD
I'm entirely, admittedly, neurotically obsessive about reading. I lock myself in my room for hours and simply read. Something my friends find to be a bit mystifying. This would also explain why I have a touch of reader's ADD at times. So let's begin by taking stock of the situation by looking at how many pages I've read in the last three days.

To page 5 -- Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy by Ann Politkovskaya (razor sharp voice from a to the point journalist, extremely intrigued by her style)

To page 10 -- Jhumpa Lahiri's The Namesake (I want to see the movie, therefore, I must read the book. I know, I know, I'm the last one to read the thing...)

To page 25 -- Siri Hustvedt's What I Loved (in all fairness, I've already read this book three times but have recommended it to a book club and must now read again as I was informed I was in the book club. But I must very emphatically say, I LOVE LOVE LOVE this book.)

And at least two others.

However, these are the ones I will dig into this long, lovely weekend.

So in the essence of talking about something I've read more than a blip of in the last week, let me bring up Graham Greene's The End of the Affair. I love it for its cruel twist of fate at the end and for the complete inner turmoil of the main character, quite frankly any one who has ever been in love knows the turmoil well (which is cruelly addicting) and for the first sentence, which is fantastically true.

A story has no beginning or end: arbitrarily one chooses that moment of experience from which to look back or from which to look ahead.

Sometimes a first sentence can be everything. This sentence isn't spectacular but it is true and this one frames the rest of the story, one that tells of Maurice Bendrix's adulterous affair with Sarah Miles. It is a story of love, hate, passion, and even the belief in God, or lack thereof, and more than that, it is a spectacularly quick read! (Something completely lacking in all the contemporary tombs of fiction out this past season.)

I'm also in the midst of Natasha's Dance: A Cultural History of Russia by Orlando Figes (If you are wondering about my seeming fetish for Russian books, yes there is one, at least for Russian classics, but I'm considering a trip to St. Petersburg in the autumn and the history is such a vital part of that) which is fantastic. Chock full of literary figures and the politics they shared and even the real life figures that made their way fictionally into books like War and Peace (which I finally managed to get through on a very long flight from Texas back to NYC).

So, that's that. This was my first blog. With time, I promise it will be more interesting and incorporate more fun things to look at, so for now, don't judge!

-Vicki Lame

Labels: ,




After This, by Alice McDermott


If you're Irish, like me, the stories of your family loom large in your mind and weigh heavily on your shoulders. Everyone from grandparents to second cousins and even great aunts and uncles work together to form a personal mythology - a collection of saints and sinners, on two sides of the Atlantic, among whom you need to find your place. Perhaps those of us in this generation, first or second in this country, are swampled in the mire of this past more than those who came before us, as we have the mystery of the square mini-photos of housewives in horn-rimmed classes to look upon, the silent squeals of the children in the Super 8 films to wonder about. We are given tidbits in the chatter of our grandmothers, glimpses from the images found in shoeboxes, and we are left to fill in the blanks. What are we to do with this information?

If you are a writer, you might easily become preoccupied with it. There is so much there, and so much missing, that it all happily becomes fodder for blank pages. Alice McDermott, author of After This, said in an interview that we tell stories in order to make something more of life. These stories, she says, give us the faith that life is valuable, even when it might seem pathetic. The first-person narrator in her 1998 book, Charming Billy, is there, she says, to string together the various stories in her family and "make something of it." Of the Billy in the book's title, she says, "They love him so dearly and are so fond of him and have - they've watched him destroy himself - and it's not enough for them to say, well, Billy's had an unfortunate life. They need to make something more of his life. And they do that by telling stories about him."

That is exactly what she seems to be doing in her most recent book, After This. I'm reading it at a steady pace, and thoroughly enjoying the characters and the language (which seems to fit easily into my own head, as though I was reading my own words), but I'm also starting to wonder what is going on. My husband asked me a simple question - What is it about? - and I found myself rattling off a few boring details. A man and a woman meet, get married, have kids, move to Long Island - and, oh yeah, they're Irish (more like a sidenote here). What is happening in this novel? I wondered. Why am I not totally bored? There's no charm and no Billy - these characters are rather dull people, forgotten even by the people in their own town, and yet I keep reading. Perhaps it is because McDermott is slowly revealing the mundane facts of a few typical lives, the ones of those who appear in the worn photos we stumble across at the bottom of our closets, and I am like the narrator in Charming Billy, left to make something of it.

--Deirdre Faughey

Labels:




A Year of Magical Thinking

You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you get what... you ask for (within the price limit).

At least that's how it works in my family at Christmas. My family is so huge, and so organized, that years ago we developed a Kris Kringle system for giving gifts. This is not unfamiliar to most people. But perhaps our Kris Kringle website concept is. The idea: Pick a name out of the "hat," send an email to my aunt telling her what you want, get it on Christmas Eve. She creates the spectacular Faughey family Christmas website, complete with signing and dancing snowmen, pictures of last year's festivities, and a link next to your Kringle's name directing you to correct shopping venue. Simple. Easy. Brilliant!

This year I asked for books -- books I thought I'd probably never get to read, considering I have a four month old baby at home -- because my Amazon Wishlist was growing long and feeling a bit neglected. So when it came time for me to open my Christmas present no one was surprised when I said, Yeah! Books!

"Tell us what you got!"

"O-kay," I played along, as if they had no idea. "Oh this one I'm really excited about. It's called Knitting Vintage Socks."

Oooooooooooooo, they sang in unison -- as though I was the conductor.

"And this one is supposed to be really good, it’s called Prep."

"What's it about?"

"Um, it's about some kids in prep school."

Oooooooooooooo, again - a little weaker.

"And this one is called The Year of Magical Thinking, by Joan Didion, and it's about... Well, it's about death."

Ewwwwwwwwwwww!

I turned to see my aunt's pursed lips and scrunched up nose -- she looked as though she'd just been given a mouthful of vinegar. She'd heard of the book, but Why?? was all she asked.

I don't know why I wanted The Year of Magical Thinking. I'm a young woman, recently married and a new mother, living in a beautiful new apartment; life is at its exciting beginning for me, and Didion's book is about losing all of that. In fact, her book is sad enough without knowing that a year after she lost her husband, just weeks before the book was due out, she lost her only daughter to the mysterious illness detailed in the text. I knew that, and yet I was drawn to those pages like none other in recent months. A few nights I even lay in bed, my thumb-sucking daughter at my side, reading passages out loud to her (of course, my sing-song tone slightly different perhaps than Didion intended).

I finished most of Magical Thinking one night I kept the light on until 3 am. My daughter doesn't even keep me up that late, so I can assure you the book must be good. The parts I enjoyed the most were those that gave me glimpses of Didion's life with her husband and daughter, when they lived in California and threw fabulous parties, went swimming in pools and noticed peacocks strutting around their garden. Then I enjoyed their life in New York, starting their early morning walks together in Central Park and then going their separate ways, working until late in the night and then going for dinner at some swank restaurant. But the parts that had me hooked were the ones where they fought -- you only got snippets of those ("Why do you always have to be right?") -- and the time they flew to Hawaii to "save their marriage" (which Didion wrote about in an article for Life). It seemed that life could be wonderful in the midst of the horrible, or horrible in the midst of the wonderful, and that made it feel so real. Familiar. I needed to know that, to be reminded of that as I sat inside my apartment, too cold to go outside, with company too young for conversation, with days growing longer and darker.

But of course this is a book about grief and the process of grieving, which leads to her title about magical thinking. Sometimes I wish for that magical thinking to come upon me before any kind of grief does. She imagined her dead husband walking in the door at any moment, in need of his shoes, and so she never got rid of them. I imagine myself up all night with a really good book, and so I pile them up next to my bed and still ask for more. I wondered, must we grieve for people -- can we grieve for time? Can we be living the happiest time of our lives, and still feel some kind of grief?

Magical Thinking is now on my lower bookshelf, where my daughter's restless and destructive hands might find it in a few months. Of course, I'll count myself lucky if they do. I'm off to read Prep, a book about some kids in prep school. I hope to finish it before next Christmas -- I hope to finish it in one glorious night.

So it turns out, at Christmas time, you just might find, you get what you ask for, and that could be just what you need.

-Deirdre Faughey

Labels: ,





join
sign up for the identity theory newsletter.

your e-mail:

bloggers

"What We're Reading" is a group blog discussing the books currently being read by the Identity Theory staff and viewers of the site. We invite you to contribute. To chime in, email Matt Borondy.

Archives

January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
January 2006
February 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
September 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008



etc.

Print this page
E-mail this page

 Subscribe in a reader

 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?




 

All work on Identity Theory -- with the exception of the public-domain classics -- is copyright its original author. The site is best viewed with the most recent version of Internet Explorer.